Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Surfing blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than Moto G 5G Plus, having a global score of 84.7 against 82.6. Although the Galaxy A32 and Moto G 5G Plus were released only 7 months apart, Galaxy A32's body is a little lighter but also a little bit thicker. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A32. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
The Moto G 5G Plus has a sharper display than Galaxy A32, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2520 resolution, much more pixels per display inch and a quite bigger display. The Galaxy A32 has just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Moto G 5G Plus features a battery life that's just as good as the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy A32. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.