Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Smoke black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 general score. Samsung Galaxy A32 is a newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Power, although it's also just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11 OS.
The Moto G Power features a more vivid display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2300 resolution and a higher screen density. Motorola Moto G Power counts with a CPU that is very similar to the processor in Samsung Galaxy A32, both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 and the Moto G Power both feature really similar batteries duration.
The Galaxy A32 features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.