Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is slightly better than Motorola Moto G60, having an 84.7 score against 79.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy A32 and Motorola Moto G60 were released only 3 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A32 is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS, while Motorola Moto G60 counts with Android 11 OS.
Moto G60 has a more vivid display than Galaxy A32, because it has a greater pixels count per screen inch, a much higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bigger display. Moto G60's storage capacity to install applications and games is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A32 one, they have a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and equal internal memory capacity.
Moto G60 has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Moto G60 has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a 20 percent larger battery capacity. The Moto G60 features a much better camera than Galaxy A32, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Moto G60 also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.