Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is better than Moto G8 Power's overall score of 76. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, and Moto G8 Power counts with Android 10 operating system. The Galaxy A32 is a newer and a bit thinner device than the Moto G8 Power, although it is also a little bit heavier.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a way better 1080 x 2300 resolution. Galaxy A32 has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a CPU that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A32's CPU, both have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Moto G8 Power and Samsung Galaxy A32 both have extremely similar battery performance. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.