Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 13 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | -- |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the Moto G84, with a overall score of 84.7 against 80.9. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, and Moto G84 has Android 13 operating system. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a lot better processing power than Moto G84, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Moto G84 has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Moto G84 also has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a greater display pixels density. Moto G84 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G84 also counts with a higher 50 MP resolution camera and better 60 fps video frame rate.
The Moto G84 features just a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G84's battery performance is very similar to the battery duration in Galaxy A32.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.