Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting a overall score of 84.7 against 76.4. The Galaxy A32 design is newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, but it's a lot thicker and extremely heavier. Galaxy A32 has a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger number of cores (although slower).
Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a brighter screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater display density and a way higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Galaxy A32 takes clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 also has a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features more memory for games and applications than Galaxy A32, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A32 counts with a much longer battery life than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.