Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. The Galaxy A32 is a way newer phone than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's thicker and way heavier. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a way better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a lot better screen pixel density.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A32, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A32. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A32 captures better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger camera aperture. Galaxy A32 has a way better battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.