Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Moto Z2 Play's overall score of 77.4. Samsung Galaxy A32's body is notably newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, although it's extremely thicker and extremely heavier. Moto Z2 Play has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A32. Both have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels count in each inch in the display and a better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution. Moto Z2 Play has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A32, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z2 Play also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A32 counts with a much better battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A32 counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.