Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is a bit better than Moto Z3, having a general score of 84.7 against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, while Moto Z3 comes with Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Samsung Galaxy A32's body is extremely newer than the Moto Z3's, but it's heavier and incredibly thicker.
The Moto Z3 features a much better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160px. The Motorola Moto Z3 features more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A32. They have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy A32 has a way better battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A32 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a much more megapixels camera and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.