Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's overall score of 76.3. Galaxy A32 is a notably newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, although it's a lot heavier and extremely thicker. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2160px resolution and a greater pixel density.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play has more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A32 has a little faster processing unit than Moto Z3 Play. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a really longer battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A32 counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.