Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Motorola One Action's global score of 78.5. Galaxy A32 is a heavier cellphone than Motorola One Action, but both have the same thickness. Motorola One Action features a brighter display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher display pixel density and a way better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution.
Motorola One Action has a better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola One Action has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy A32 shoots better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also has a lot better 48 MP resolution back camera. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.