Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Zoom's 80 score. The Galaxy A32 construction is newer than Motorola One Zoom's, although it is just a little heavier and a little bit thicker. Motorola One Zoom features a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 and Motorola One Zoom count with very similar processing units, they have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Motorola One Zoom has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a back camera with a 48 mega pixels, the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy A32 features superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.