Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 15 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | -- |
| TFT | LTPO |
| 270 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 general score. Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 OS. The Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A32 features a way better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a much better video quality and a camera with a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution. Galaxy A32 features a little better battery duration than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.