Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-11-09 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.65 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Midnight Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.89 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is slightly better than the Nokia X100's 77.3 overall score. The Galaxy A32 body has the same thickness than Nokia X100, but it's a bit lighter. Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while Nokia X100 counts with Android 11 OS. The Nokia X100 counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Nokia X100 also has more RAM memory.
Nokia X100 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a little larger screen, more pixels per inch of display and a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Nokia X100 counts with more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB, the Nokia X100 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much better camera than Nokia X100. They have a same resolution camera in the back. Galaxy A32 features a little longer battery duration than Nokia X100, because it has a 12% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.