Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-05-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.65 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Midnight Sun and Nordic Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.89 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4470mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than Nokia X20, having an 84.7 score against 77.2. The Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, while Nokia X20 counts with Android 11 operating system. The Galaxy A32 body has the same thickness than the Nokia X20, but it is a little bit lighter.
Nokia X20 features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a much better resolution of 2400 x 1080, a bit bigger display and a higher pixels number per display inch. The Nokia X20 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Nokia X20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Nokia X20 counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a little longer battery lifetime than Nokia X20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4470mAh.
Galaxy A32 takes way better photos and videos than Nokia X20, although it has a much worse resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.