Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | -- |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 score. Samsung Galaxy A32's body is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G works with Android 11 OS. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations.
The Galaxy A32 has a much longer battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.