Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A32's 84.7 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is an way older phone than the Galaxy A32, but it is thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a better screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a much higher 1080 x 2220px resolution. Galaxy A32 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.