Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A32's score of 84.7. Galaxy Note 20's construction is a little lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy A32, even though both were only released with a few months difference. The Galaxy Note 20 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A32, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a little larger display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back-facing camera with much more MP and better 30 frames per second video frame rates. The Galaxy A32 counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.