Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, having a overall score of 84.7 against 81.2. Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, while Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 operating system. Samsung Galaxy A32's body is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3's, although it is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 lesser processing cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Galaxy Note 3 features a way better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a greater amount of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A32 takes better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations and a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A32 has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.