Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 5, having an 84.7 score against 79.3. Galaxy A32's design is extremely newer than Galaxy Note 5's, although it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, while Galaxy Note 5 comes with Android 5.1 operating system.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a greater number of cores. The Galaxy Note 5 counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better pixel amount per inch in the display and a much better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Galaxy A32 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also has a back camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and video.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.