Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's general score of 80.4. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a extremely newer cellphone than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it's heavier and thicker. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a way greater display pixels density.
The Galaxy A32 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
The Galaxy A32 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light images, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a superior battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.