Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A32's 84.7 score. Although Galaxy Note10 is older than the Galaxy A32, it's design is thinner and somewhat lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2280 resolution and a higher pixel amount in each inch of screen.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Note10 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.