Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a bit better than the Galaxy Note5, with an 84.7 score against 80.2. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A32 is noticeably newer than the Galaxy Note5, it's somewhat heavier and thicker. The Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A32. Both have 8 cores and the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a sharper display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a much higher pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A32 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A32 features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.