Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, having an 84.7 score against 79.5. The Galaxy A32 body is way newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note7. The Galaxy Note7 features a better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a way higher display pixel density.
The Galaxy A32 has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A32 also has a greater number of cores (although they are slower). The Galaxy A32 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A32 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a much better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.