Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A32's general score of 84.7. The Samsung Galaxy S20 design is thinner and extremely lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A32, even though it was released around 11 months before. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with Android 13 OS, while Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS.
Galaxy S20 has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has 8 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a lot higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and better 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A32 features better battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.