Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Galaxy A32, with a 98 score against 84.7. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and just a little bit heavier device than Galaxy A32, but Samsung was able to make it just a little bit thinner anyway. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G works with Android 13 operating system, and Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a little bigger screen, much more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back camera with a way better resolution and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a battery duration that's very similar to the battery life in Galaxy A32.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.