Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is much better than the Galaxy A32's general score of 84.7. Samsung Galaxy S22 works with Android 13 operating system, and Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system. Samsung Galaxy S22's body is newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy A32.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater screen density and a lot better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Galaxy A32 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with better battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has a 35% more battery size.
Galaxy S22 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.