Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-22 | -- |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 7.23 ounces | -- |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S25's overall score of 82.6. Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, while Galaxy S25 works with Android 14 operating system. Galaxy S25 has a much sharper display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher screen pixels density and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a lot better video resolution and a better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.