Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is much better than Galaxy S7 Active, having a score of 84.7 against 75.8. Even though the Galaxy A32 is a little heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active, it's a little thinner and also incredibly newer. The Galaxy S7 Active has a way better screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a much better count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A32 counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Galaxy A32 has superior battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.