Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S8's 81.7 general score. Galaxy A32's construction is much newer than the Galaxy S8's, but it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier. Galaxy S8 features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
The Galaxy S8 features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A32. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. Galaxy A32 features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S8, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 has a much better camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A32 features a superior battery performance than Galaxy S8, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.