Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S9, having an 84.7 score against 83.3. Samsung Galaxy A32's design is extremely newer, but a little thicker and a lot heavier than Samsung Galaxy S9. The Galaxy S9 features an incredibly better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a way higher pixel quantity per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S9, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a little faster processor than Galaxy A32. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A32 has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Galaxy A32 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.