Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a global score of 84.7 against 80.1. The Galaxy A32 is a newer device, and it's also somewhat lighter and a lot thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a lot better pixel density and a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy A32 features a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A32 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.