Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android | Android 13 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2023-05-11 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 2.80 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Khaki Green and Platinum Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.74 inches (1/1.35") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than the Sony Xperia 1 V's score of 82.7. Samsung Galaxy A32 is a way older, a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than Sony Xperia 1 V. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, while Sony Xperia 1 V works with Android 13 operating system.
Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior performance than Sony Xperia 1 V, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xperia 1 V counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xperia 1 V also has a much higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1644 x 3840 pixels.
The Sony Xperia 1 V features slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Xperia 1 V has a superior camera than Galaxy A32, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Xperia 1 V also counts with higher 120 fps video frame rates.
The Sony Xperia 1 V's battery lifetime is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A32 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.