Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.18 x 2.72 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is slightly better than Sony Xperia 10 II, having a overall score of 84.7 against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, while Sony Xperia 10 II counts with Android 10 operating system. Despite being the best device we are comparing here, it must be told that it is also a noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker device.
The Xperia 10 II's processor is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A32 one, both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cores. Xperia 10 II has a better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a much higher pixel amount per inch in the display.
Sony Xperia 10 II has more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a superior battery lifetime than Xperia 10 II, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A32 has a superior camera than Sony Xperia 10 II, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.