Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-10-12 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue and Grey |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 II is just a bit better than Galaxy A32, getting a general score of 87.2 against 84.7. The Xperia 5 II is a somewhat thinner and a lot lighter phone than Galaxy A32, even when both were released with only 3 months difference. The Xperia 5 II features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xperia 5 II also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Sony Xperia 5 II features a much better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a lot better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution. Galaxy A32 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Xperia 5 II, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera with much more megapixels.
Xperia 5 II features a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia 5 II, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.