Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 general score. Even though the Galaxy A32 is somewhat heavier than Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's way thinner and much newer. Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, and Xperia XZ2 Compact comes with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2160px resolution and a much higher pixel density.
The Galaxy A32 features a better memory capacity for apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 has a very superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 74% more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a slightly better camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.