Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than Xperia XZ2 Premium, with a overall score of 84.7 against 82.2. Galaxy A32 is a much newer cellphone, and it is also noticeably thinner and lighter than Xperia XZ2 Premium. The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixel count per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 2160 x 3840px. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a bit better camera than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same camera aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a lot more MP camera in the back.
Galaxy A32 features a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a very superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 41 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.