Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than the Sony Xperia XZs, with a general score of 84.7 against 77.2. The Galaxy A32 body is notably newer than Sony Xperia XZs's, although it is thicker and heavier. The Sony Xperia XZs features a more vivid display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a lot better pixels density.
Galaxy A32 has a bit better CPU than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy A32 also has more CPU cores (although slower). Galaxy A32 counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal memory.
The Xperia XZs has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, although it has a worse video definition, a camera in the back with much less megapixels resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture. The Galaxy A32 features a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.