Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than Xperia Z4v's global score of 78.8. The Galaxy A32 design is extremely newer than the Xperia Z4v's, although it's noticeably heavier and just a bit thicker. Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, while Xperia Z4v comes with Android 5.1 OS.
Sony Xperia Z4v has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better pixel quantity per display inch and a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much greater memory for apps and games than Xperia Z4v, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an additional GPU. The Galaxy A32 has a really longer battery duration than Xperia Z4v, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A32 takes clearer photographs and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.