Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is a bit better than vivo X70 Pro, having an 84.7 score against 78.3. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while vivo X70 Pro works with Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy A32's body is somewhat thicker and heavier than vivo X70 Pro. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A32, because it has a better pixel density, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a bit larger screen.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X70 Pro features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A32 features a little better battery life than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The vivo X70 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger aperture, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.