Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Blasting black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32, having a 90.1 score against 84.7. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro design is just a little heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A32. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with Android 10 OS, while Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a little bit larger screen, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a lot higher screen pixels density.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same aperture and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a lot more MP back-facing camera and higher 60 fps video frame rates. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A32 feature really similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.