Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-03-06 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.10 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue and Purple |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9's 83.2 score. The Galaxy A32 body is newer, but thicker and heavier than Xiaomi Mi 9. Xiaomi Mi 9 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 9 has a better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a higher pixel density. Galaxy A32 features a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 9 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video definition and a camera in the back with a 48 megapixels, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also has faster video frame rate. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.