Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and Gold |
| Metal and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2's general score of 77.5. The Samsung Galaxy A32 design is noticeably newer and just a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2's, although it's thicker. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 and the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 both count with really similar processors, both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy A32, because it has 5300mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A32 counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also has a camera in the back with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.