Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue and Green |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's 83.8 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 body is way newer and a little bit lighter, but also a little bit thicker than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a more vivid display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A32 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and the same aperture, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has just a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A32 has a really longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.