Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's general score of 84.3. The Samsung Galaxy A32 design is a little lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, but it's noticeably thicker and was released 4 years before. The Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with Android 14 OS.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a lot better pixel quantity per display inch, a much higher resolution of 2224 x 2488 and a larger screen. Galaxy A32 has a really superior performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a better camera than Galaxy A32, because it has a more megapixels back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments and a lot better video resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a little bit more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a 2 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.