Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting an 84.7 score against 81.6. Even when the Galaxy A32 and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC were released only 5 months apart, the Galaxy A32 is a little bit lighter and just a little thinner. Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC works with Android 10 operating system.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a sharper display than Galaxy A32, because it has a greater pixels density, a quite larger screen and a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Galaxy A32 counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A32, because it has a 3 percent more battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.