Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's global score of 82.4. The Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has Android 11 operating system. Despite being the best phone in this review, we must note that it is also a thicker and a little heavier phone.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much sharper display than Galaxy A32, because it has a greater pixel number per display inch, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a better memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A32 feature extremely similar battery durations, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.