Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 construction is just a little heavier and just a bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with Android 10 OS.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has more pixels per screen inch and a much higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a CPU that's very similar to Galaxy A32's CPU, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has 1 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same 1920x1080 video resolution, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a battery lifetime that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy A32's battery duration, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.