Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 global score. The Galaxy A32 design is just a little thicker but a little lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and both were only released with a couple of months difference. Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with Android 10 OS.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, more pixels per display inch and a bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A32, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a battery lifetime that is just as good as Galaxy A32's battery life, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 0% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.