Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 score. Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS, and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy A32's body is newer and just a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's, although it is also just a bit thicker.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a better memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both of them have the same video frame rates, the same resolution back facing camera, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's battery life is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A32 one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.